Proposed de-amalgamation of the City of Canterbury Bankstown
The City of Canterbury Bankstown (CBCity) was formed on 12 May 2016 through the merger of the former Bankstown City Council (BCC) and Canterbury City Council (CCC).
Council’s current position is that it supports de‑amalgamation in principal, but that it should only proceed where all establishment and ongoing costs are fully funded by the NSW Government and not borne by local residents. In the absence of such a commitment, Council has suspended further de‑amalgamation work.
Recent amendments to the Local Government Act 1993 and Local Government (General) Regulation 2021 have established a legislative framework through which amalgamated councils may seek to de-amalgamate.
De-amalgamation is a complex process involving legislative, financial, governance and community consultation requirements. Any proposal must be supported by a detailed business case and be considered in accordance with the requirements of NSW legislation.
This subject has generated significant interest and discussion. The information below provides an overview of the de-amalgamation process, answers to frequently asked questions, and outlines key events that have informed discussion of de-amalgamation for CBCity.
Timeline of events
2013-2015
The NSW local government reform process identifies council mergers as an option. BCC and CCC participate in the Fit for the Future assessment process. IPART found BCC "Fit for the Future" and CCC "Not Fit for the Future" due to scale and capacity challenges.
January-April 2016
The NSW Government merger proposal was formally assessed, including independent review and community consultation.
12 May 2016
BCC and CCC amalgamated to form the City of Canterbury Bankstown (CBCity).
9 September 2017
The first CBCity election was held.
2018-2021
Council addressed amalgamation impacts including funding requests. Rates harmonisation and financial sustainability measures (special rate variation) implemented.
May 2021
NSW Government legislation introduced an initial pathway for amalgamated councils to pursue de-amalgamation through a business case process. The framework provided limited detail about the development, assessment and implementation of proposals and was subsequently replaced (see May 2025).
2021-2024
Council supported the principal of de-amalgamation, and the preparation of a Business Case, including associated financial, community and governance impacts. A draft Business Case went to Council for endorsement in September 2022, which was noted with additional research requested including a community phone survey. Council’s support was subject to the NSW Government committing to fully fund the cost of de-amalgamation and all ongoing costs.
A resolution of Council in November 2023 called for a halt on all work and expenditure on investigating de-amalgamation until such time as there was a NSW Government commitment to fully funding de-amalgamation.
May 2025
Initial de-amalgamation provisions were replaced. Amendments to the Local Government Act 1993 and Local Government (General) Regulation 2021 establish a more detailed framework for the assessment and implementation of de-amalgamation proposals.
2026
Council continues to advocate for the NSW Government to fully fund de-amalgamations.
Frequently asked questions
Council has made it clear that any support for a de-amalgamation would be dependent on ensuring any cost is not passed on to residents. A July 2022 Council report indicated these costs were conservatively estimated at over $53 million upfront and over $20 million in annual recurrent costs. Any future cost estimates would need to take into account inflation and changes in labour, goods and service costs since 2022.
Under Section 218CC of the Local Government Act 1993, the Minister may grant a council up to $5 million to offset the cost of de-amalgamation. Any other costs must be funded by the council, which may include a loan subject to interest rates set by the NSW Treasury Corporation, further increasing costs. Any costs not funded by NSW Government grant assistance would need to be met by the relevant council or councils, which could have implications for council finances, rates, service levels or borrowing requirements.
Recent amendments to the Local Government Act 1993 establish the process/es that an amalgamated council or other group must follow if it wishes to pursue a de-amalgamation.
A proposal can be started by:
- The Minister;
- A group of enrolled voters (electors); or
- A council affected by the proposal.
For a proposal initiated by voters:
A group of enrolled voters can submit a proposal directly to the Minister. The number of voters needed depends on the area affected by the proposal. If the proposal affects an entire council area, or proposes a new council area, support is needed from 250 enrolled voters or 10% of enrolled voters in the area, whichever number is greater.
For a proposal initiated by a Council:
- Preparing, publicly exhibiting, consulting on and submitting a written business case to the Minister for Local Government outlining:
- The de-amalgamation proposal and reasons supporting it;
- The details of consultation undertaken and the council resolution supporting the proposal;
- Financial information, including costs, funding arrangements, financial impacts and future rates and charges;
- Geographic information relating to the proposed areas;
- Proposed governance, operational and transitional arrangements, including staffing, assets, councillor representation and ward structures; and
- Information about the long-term sustainability, strategic planning and service-delivery capacity of the proposed councils;
- Referral of the business case by the Minister to the Local Government Boundaries Commission for examination and report;
- Following consideration of the Boundaries Commission's report and other relevant matters, the Minister may approve the holding of a de-amalgamation referendum;
- If the referendum is supported by a majority of votes cast by enrolled electors, the Minister may make recommendations to the Governor to give effect to the de-amalgamation.
The implications would depend on the final de-amalgamation proposal and the outcomes of any business case, referendum and subsequent implementation process. Potential implications could include changes to council boundaries, governance arrangements, staffing structures, service delivery models, asset and liability allocations, the financial position of the new councils and therefore the rates and charges for the new areas. Any proposal would need to address how these matters would be managed and the impacts on residents, businesses and other stakeholders.
The initial provisions for de-amalgamation introduced in the Local Government Amendment Act 2021 No 11 included a 10-year timeframe within which amalgamated councils could de-amalgamate. This timeframe was removed with the introduction of Local Government Amendment (De-amalgamations) Act 2024 No 21.
The formal applications and determinations made by IPART prior to the amalgamation being announced are available for each former council here. While IPART determined that BCC satisfied all criteria and was considered “Fit for the Future”, CCC satisfied the financial criteria but not the scale and capacity criteria, with IPART determining it was “Not Fit for the Future”.
Both councils had realised operational efficiencies and were considered very lean in their operations, but both had also foreshadowed that they would need to look at special rate variations (SRV) in the future to address asset renewal.
Each council's financial strategy was quite different. Income and therefore also expenditure was much higher for BCC compared to CCC. BCC had focused more heavily on capital expenditure than CCC, meaning that despite already having a SRV in place, funding for asset renewal had been proportionally lower in CCC.
Approximately 40% of rates income comes from the former CCC area, and 60% from the former BCC area.
We are now one City. Investment focuses on delivering high-quality community outcomes considering both funding availability and asset condition. While consideration is given to ensuring a strong level of investment across the City, location is not the key determining factor.
Council’s capital works program is developed through a strategic and evidence-based process that considers a broad range of asset categories and locations. The program is designed to ensure a balanced investment in infrastructure, with projects prioritised based on asset condition, community need and available funding, including external grants.
| Bankstown | Canterbury |
Land Area | 78km2 | 33.4km2 |
Population | 228,000+ | 161,000+ |
Length of roads | 576.6km | 328.3km |
Area of open space | 838ha | 289ha |
Cost to replace existing assets | $3.25B | $1.75B |
Average asset condition (out of five) | 2.4 | 2.3 |
Total rateable properties | 71,218 | 54,891 |
Current estimated annual rates income | $149.3M | $101.46M |
Estimated cumulative capital budget post-amalgamation (to 2024/25)* | $290M | $360M |
*This is a cumulative figure and includes carry-forward amounts.